sobota 31. ledna 2015

Home horror with five stars.



Saturday, January 31, 2015

                                               Home horror with five stars.
(There are over one name, all posts that were labeled "Home five star")

Personal experiences and insights on the so-called. "Senior Home" (DS) of Prague, in Heřmanova Městci, who called. "Association of Social Services' Czech Republic (APSSCR)" awarded the highest award of five (5) stars for long-term high quality of social services. "

After fourteen months' proleželých in appalling conditions "in the so-called." Hospitals for the chronically ill "(LDN), without any rehabilitation, with the exception of" dedication "physiotherapist in LDN in Dačicích that" help elderly, ill and disabled considered his mission " I learned that I have to be "placed in a retirement home."
In the first hospice in Humpolci, where I briefly "amputee" and still "under the influence of powerful sedatives and painkillers transferred to me the local social worker" brought to sign a piece of paper - application, based on which I later housed somewhere. " Nothing more then I knew.

When I was in April 2006, he found himself in a "retirement home" in Heřmanova Městci, later renamed the "Home for the Elderly" (DS), the "founder" is the Prague City Hall (City Hall), I did not "do what poison".
I thought, however, that in any "důchoďáku" I will not stay long. "I will as soon as possible in order," Find a job and other "living". This, however, I had no idea what awaits me, and that all the "official speeches about the possibilities of disabled people in the Czech Republic are just crap."
I hoped, too, that I would have had no "right" to a wheelchair, and that I will be after 14 months of "finally" removed the remains of stitches and "stub" legs will be adjusted so that I could wear a prosthesis. Doctors in LDN me "claimed" that "to wheelchair LDN I have lost a leg stump me will be adjusted when I placed permanently in an institution, because such operations should be a long-term plan."

The "home" I was staying in a small room with private toilet and shower, where, however, one-on client inv. Truck did not, so had no choice but to come to a common toilet in the hallway, or "the little used rookie".
"The Roommate," which was my age, and so disabled as I am too moved on inv. Truck. So if one wanted to leave the room, the other had to go too, or "crawl" on the bed. That, too, was "one of the things that do not contribute to good relations in the room."
Another, more serious was the fact that the "client" was "addicted to alcohol". "He drank half a liter of vodka without flinching and without the bottle drew from his mouth." Along with medication, which he used, it made him "deranged creature that attacked anyone who looked at him while shouting that to him was not anything happen here, because he was twice in a madhouse."
I mostly of course "carried away" me. "Threats of assault and murder were rampant." "To his threats stressed brandished a knife against me" which was then kept on the table.
After this his "alcohol intoxication" was from him almost every time the room "pozvracený and fucking from his excrement". "Cleaning" of such "peace" is always kept up to "the other day", when the cleaning lady came, so most nights when I was with the "client" one room "lived", I actually "Awake" on a chair in the dining room "due stench and fears for his life. " The rooms are cleaned mostly a way that "it is swapped his bedding, which was the most polluted, and just wiped the floor where it was seen." So even if you had a window in the room open "day and night, the stench was still there."
Although, staff, ward sister and management "knew about his behavior" since the previous roommate, "did not do anything so I at least I could sleep in peace."
On the contrary, I began to be so, "accused of complaining loudly about them, and nothing we can do it in such go home and I would have to adapt!"
 Here I would like to point out that I already was a few years' teetotaler and non-smoker. "
Similar "alcoholics" is here among clients more. From what I've heard, "one who could not walk, bought alcohol personnel when the person concerned did not have anyone else at hand."
After about two months, "life-threatening", I was moved to another room, where he was "similar to the client." However, he was not so "aggressive" and too "much to drink, because he did it his" state of health did not permit. "
I was moved because I'm keeping DS "emphatically pointed out that I turn for help on TV, because we can no longer endure such suffering!"
Some time "after the move, after I gave a little mentally in order," I myself "involved" in one of the local "activities", the production of fine ceramics. In about a month, I was due to employee DS, which had among other things, "charge" of the production of ceramics, moved to a new facility DS, in the Villas.
                                                                                            
 "Vila" is a renovated two-story house, near the main object DS "Castle". They live in it mentally handicapped clients of the Castle. That apparently was the main condition 'rights organizations mentally handicapped ", which contributed considerable financial sum to purchase and renovation of the house. Mentally handicapped there but lived only five out of a total of 21 clients.
In Vile I got a separate room in the attic, without sanitary facilities. He was pretty small, but I was glad I do not live with some "aggressive alcoholic".

That was a "reconstruction" Villas performed "poorly and unprofessionally", manifested from the very beginning of the use of this object. It often happened that someone "stuck" in an elevator because "circuit breakers were fitted in damp and moldy basement and fell out." Because "Moisture and mold" later had to be "repaired" the wall in the dining room, too. Railings on the narrow staircase in an elevator leading to the attic was only on one side, and so low that I doubt whether meet the 'standard'.
Heating with fans at the glass wall, placed in the floor and mounted on a short screws and "dowel", which after a short time, "rozviklali" their "sound resembled the sound of old motor mowers." In the three-storey building, where 21 were accommodated old, ill and hardly moving clients, not a "do now is put the fire alarm." A small room on the ground floor, served not only as a dressing room for the staff, but also as a desk and surgery.

By the time I arrived at the villa I "finally" got "his" wheelchair at a hospital in Pardubice me were removed after more than 1.5 years from amputation remaining stitches and adapted "stub" legs. I hoped that I subsequently entrusted to the "professional care" rehabilitation and orthopedic-prosthetics in "appropriate equipment".
Rehabilitation nurse DS, along with the orthopedic surgeon who commutes to the DS, but decided that "not going anywhere, dentures make me a company that is doing well other clients, rehabilitate and learn to walk with'll help our staff, as well as others."
At the same time "to such work, the DS had no relevant qualifications" and I later found "a way of making me a rehabilitation nurse learning to walk, was wrong from the beginning." When "beneath me broke poorly made prosthesis" I refused these "dangerous experiment" continue, prosthesis, I returned again and I demanded to be "placed in the care of professionals."
It was not me again upheld a rehabilitation nurse told me that "I should look for a company myself when I displeased with what he offers me"!
Although the DS leadership, top and head nurse, including social workers, "knew about my problems, none of them stood up for me." On the contrary, I began to be "again as a problematic client who wants to customize!"

On the internet I found a "prosthetic company" from the bed, and I hoped that it would be "the right one", especially after my employee of "firm" portrayed himself "what are they known company with rich experience and expert on the prosthesis on ".
Unfortunately, I later realized that I was actually "cheated". "Trusting the promises of employees of the company, adjusting her prosthesis and all maintenance, anytime - you just call" I had previously signed a "Vouchers for health aids" for NGA.
What for me this "company" produced was "just poor" as from the previous one. And there was a "problem contact" of this "technique" and when he "accidentally" came and "just did not have the necessary tools or materials themselves, even took the car."
Finally Me "failed to communicate at all" and "was the phrase" just a rehabilitation nurse DS, which is trying to convince me that "you do not have to invent and be satisfied with what I got."
"Adjusting and fine-tuning" of the prosthesis in the first weeks of wear, it is common practice and procedure, especially when it is called. "Prvoprotézu".
From matron DS, I learned that I was going to "Rehabilitation Institute" in Luži. S "company" that made me a prosthesis which has its headquarters in Luži too, is said to have agreed that to me there's an employee "visits, adjust my prosthesis and I'll be there soon learn to walk." I told her that I was going, but I want that when his "visit" was present either prosthetics doctor or another professional Rehabilitation Institute in Luži that will "oversee what he's doing, and especially want to have a witness, if I turn promised something, then you will not want to meet. " During my whole stay in Luži, me "no employee of the company visited" even though I already Luži phone twice contacted the company owner, talked with him, date of the visit and I told him, too, under what conditions I want to meet with him and that I informing and their attending doctor in Luži who agreed with this. That was probably the "reason" why has not complied with neither the deadline agreed even though it had a "firm" in the Rehabilitation Institute "a few hundred meters." I was ask to "edit" the prosthesis also in prosthetic company at the Rehabilitation Institute in Luži and I said to them, "Who did it to me". They rejected me, that "with this company they have nothing in common, whether we are finishing ourselves." As I then found on the Internet in any discussion posts, "I was not the only one who mněla with this crafty company a bad experience." I recently found out that "these rascals run their dubious company continues".
The only "rehabilitation" of which I graduated in Luži were about four shoulder massage, which I did not need a "joint" exercises, during which I anything new that I already knew, knew.
Ever since I was in LDN in Dačicích, I "strengthened and trained," and then I had a prosthesis, I have tried them "walk", despite the fact that I "did not suit" and I was literally the "bloody bruises and abrasions ". "For my part was definitely a great effort." But "against unwillingness, apathy and malicious conduct on the part of those from whom I expected help, I had no chance to succeed himself, but I did not give up."
After returning from Luze, I ordered the DS ward nurse at the orthopedist that "when I can not be a doctor recommendations, so you'll need to complain at the Medical Chamber and ask for help media". I asked her then so, too. "Key workers", which was known for its "open, nezáludným negotiations and dedicated approach to all clients without distinction" to me then to an orthopedist for rehabilitation escorted me to have a "witness about how there with me act ".
On the rehabilitation of orthopedic then surprised me with its presence matron DS, otherwise too deputy director, which I had never seen before. Probably got a "message" from the ward nurse in Vile.
Rehabilitation nurse me started "blaming" that "refuse professional rehabilitative care that my DS offer".
I said, 'I really need a professional, qualified prosthetic care, such as rehabilitation should know, "I reminded her, and her recent words when I asked her for her" opinion "or" opinion "orthopedist MD. Christmas Eve was inconvenient prostheses "I had. Then she told me "I do not understand prostheses and Dr. Christmas even less." "Ortoped" Christmas to me then, "once again refused to" write recommendations. The present head nurse was on hand rehabilitation and orthopedic surgeon at my side was the "key worker" by head nurse "reward long dirty look", which she apparently clear that not only the director but also "fell into a big disgrace" and later It gave both "very hard to feel."
I was "told" that "I can complain about where I want."
In the following days, I wrote to several media. "Interest" appeared for some time just by Czech Television. Journalist CT, there's black sheep, Mária Křepelková his colleagues made about me and "enterprise" in Luži, a short report to his talk show and besides me brokered contact Rehabilitation Clinic in Hradec Králové. During the filming of reports to me rehabilitation nurse, along with the director, "tried as much defame and falsely defame" before the workers CT, so I was glad when this "report" on TV after all just aired.
After that, I was "too fell into disfavor large" DS leadership, especially its director pi. Málková and "feel the consequences today."
The most important thing for me is the fact that "I was after more than three years unnecessarily spent in a wheelchair could get back on its feet, though not on his own and started to walk again."
                Thanks to such people as Mrs. Mária Křepelková of CT, a team of doctors and physiotherapists from the Rehabilitation Clinic in Hradec Králové, under the leadership of head physician. Marečka techniques and prosthetic companies Malik, Mr. Milan Lamla.
First I had to "change orthopedist" to me written by someone else, wiser
"Recommendation".

From the beginning of the operation in Vile, its personnel, including ward nurse, truly "professional". In addition to the "thoughtful discussions" to clients, they tried to liven up every day some interesting activities according to their wishes and possibilities that were in Vile. Particular attention in this direction donated mentally disabled clients.
The "well-being" here lasted less than two months. There was an "exchange" ward nurse and "boarded a nurse that the DS had exactly the best reputation", especially among the mentally handicapped, whose department had "made the station."
This new "head nurse" in Vile, I will hereafter be referred to as "Rocky".
Over time, there was also "exchange" other staff. "Minders" whose "main focus" of working hours has been caring for clients, were progressively 'released'. In their place was getting "staff rather simple thinking, which mainly including Rocky, was smoking on the porch Villas and simpleminded chatter about everything." These "debates" are "regularly participated in the" Head Nurse DS. The random listening to these "debates", the client could, among other things i know how it is "Rocky" every day "busy." Barely comes home from work to go to the pub to help you in your house operates with her husband and son, where "working late into the night" and what she must wretch that "drink" so they did not really "sleepless".
 "Rocky" had apparently because of "its popular and dedicated" staff every morning, among other things, cook and Sinou coffee. "Officiate" began around 9 am. Sometimes the "staggering" even at noon.
This "her fatigue experienced the" second day of major clients DS and especially the "one who somehow expressed his dissatisfaction with the situation in Vile". It used to be on her side and her staff from "false accusations" against such "cheeky". Ninety client who "survived the concentration camp" was "physically and mentally still fresh" when talking about the "Rocky" begins "the Gestapo". 
"The new caretakers" of the castle, were in Villas Director DS "relocated reward". This is at least one of them expressed and all that you literally "high esteem".

Showing posts with label home of horror with a five star rating . Show all posts
Saturday, January 31, 2015

                                               Home horror with five stars.
(There are over one name, all posts that were labeled "Home five star")

Personal experiences and insights on the so-called. "Senior Home" (DS) of Prague, in Heřmanova Městci, who called. "Association of Social Services' Czech Republic (APSSCR)" awarded the highest award of five (5) stars for long-term high quality of social services. "

After fourteen months' proleželých in appalling conditions "in the so-called." Hospitals for the chronically ill "(LDN), without any rehabilitation, with the exception of" dedication "physiotherapist in LDN in Dačicích that" help elderly, ill and disabled considered his mission " I learned that I have to be "placed in a retirement home."
In the first hospice in Humpolci, where I briefly "amputee" and still "under the influence of powerful sedatives and painkillers transferred to me the local social worker" brought to sign a piece of paper - application, based on which I later housed somewhere. " Nothing more then I knew.

When I was in April 2006, he found himself in a "retirement home" in Heřmanova Městci, later renamed the "Home for the Elderly" (DS), the "founder" is the Prague City Hall (City Hall), I did not "do what poison".
I thought, however, that in any "důchoďáku" I will not stay long. "I will as soon as possible in order," Find a job and other "living". This, however, I had no idea what awaits me, and that all the "official speeches about the possibilities of disabled people in the Czech Republic are just crap."
I hoped, too, that I would have had no "right" to a wheelchair, and that I will be after 14 months of "finally" removed the remains of stitches and "stub" legs will be adjusted so that I could wear a prosthesis. Doctors in LDN me "claimed" that "to wheelchair LDN I have lost a leg stump me will be adjusted when I placed permanently in an institution, because such operations should be a long-term plan."

The "home" I was staying in a small room with private toilet and shower, where, however, one-on client inv. Truck did not, so had no choice but to come to a common toilet in the hallway, or "the little used rookie".
"The Roommate," which was my age, and so disabled as I am too moved on inv. Truck. So if one wanted to leave the room, the other had to go too, or "crawl" on the bed. That, too, was "one of the things that do not contribute to good relations in the room."
Another, more serious was the fact that the "client" was "addicted to alcohol". "He drank half a liter of vodka without flinching and without the bottle drew from his mouth." Along with medication, which he used, it made him "deranged creature that attacked anyone who looked at him while shouting that to him was not anything happen here, because he was twice in a madhouse."
I mostly of course "carried away" me. "Threats of assault and murder were rampant." "To his threats stressed brandished a knife against me" which was then kept on the table.
After this his "alcohol intoxication" was from him almost every time the room "pozvracený and fucking from his excrement". "Cleaning" of such "peace" is always kept up to "the other day", when the cleaning lady came, so most nights when I was with the "client" one room "lived", I actually "Awake" on a chair in the dining room "due stench and fears for his life. " The rooms are cleaned mostly a way that "it is swapped his bedding, which was the most polluted, and just wiped the floor where it was seen." So even if you had a window in the room open "day and night, the stench was still there."
Although, staff, ward sister and management "knew about his behavior" since the previous roommate, "did not do anything so I at least I could sleep in peace."
On the contrary, I began to be so, "accused of complaining loudly about them, and nothing we can do it in such go home and I would have to adapt!"
 Here I would like to point out that I already was a few years' teetotaler and non-smoker. "
Similar "alcoholics" is here among clients more. From what I've heard, "one who could not walk, bought alcohol personnel when the person concerned did not have anyone else at hand."
After about two months, "life-threatening", I was moved to another room, where he was "similar to the client." However, he was not so "aggressive" and too "much to drink, because he did it his" state of health did not permit. "
I was moved because I'm keeping DS "emphatically pointed out that I turn for help on TV, because we can no longer endure such suffering!"
Some time "after the move, after I gave a little mentally in order," I myself "involved" in one of the local "activities", the production of fine ceramics. In about a month, I was due to employee DS, which had among other things, "charge" of the production of ceramics, moved to a new facility DS, in the Villas.
                                                                                            
 "Vila" is a renovated two-story house, near the main object DS "Castle". They live in it mentally handicapped clients of the Castle. That apparently was the main condition 'rights organizations mentally handicapped ", which contributed considerable financial sum to purchase and renovation of the house. Mentally handicapped there but lived only five out of a total of 21 clients.
In Vile I got a separate room in the attic, without sanitary facilities. He was pretty small, but I was glad I do not live with some "aggressive alcoholic".

That was a "reconstruction" Villas performed "poorly and unprofessionally", manifested from the very beginning of the use of this object. It often happened that someone "stuck" in an elevator because "circuit breakers were fitted in damp and moldy basement and fell out." Because "Moisture and mold" later had to be "repaired" the wall in the dining room, too. Railings on the narrow staircase in an elevator leading to the attic was only on one side, and so low that I doubt whether meet the 'standard'.
Heating with fans at the glass wall, placed in the floor and mounted on a short screws and "dowel", which after a short time, "rozviklali" their "sound resembled the sound of old motor mowers." In the three-storey building, where 21 were accommodated old, ill and hardly moving clients, not a "do now is put the fire alarm." A small room on the ground floor, served not only as a dressing room for the staff, but also as a desk and surgery.

By the time I arrived at the villa I "finally" got "his" wheelchair at a hospital in Pardubice me were removed after more than 1.5 years from amputation remaining stitches and adapted "stub" legs. I hoped that I subsequently entrusted to the "professional care" rehabilitation and orthopedic-prosthetics in "appropriate equipment".
Rehabilitation nurse DS, along with the orthopedic surgeon who commutes to the DS, but decided that "not going anywhere, dentures make me a company that is doing well other clients, rehabilitate and learn to walk with'll help our staff, as well as others."
At the same time "to such work, the DS had no relevant qualifications" and I later found "a way of making me a rehabilitation nurse learning to walk, was wrong from the beginning." When "beneath me broke poorly made prosthesis" I refused these "dangerous experiment" continue, prosthesis, I returned again and I demanded to be "placed in the care of professionals."
It was not me again upheld a rehabilitation nurse told me that "I should look for a company myself when I displeased with what he offers me"!
Although the DS leadership, top and head nurse, including social workers, "knew about my problems, none of them stood up for me." On the contrary, I began to be "again as a problematic client who wants to customize!"

On the internet I found a "prosthetic company" from the bed, and I hoped that it would be "the right one", especially after my employee of "firm" portrayed himself "what are they known company with rich experience and expert on the prosthesis on ".
Unfortunately, I later realized that I was actually "cheated". "Trusting the promises of employees of the company, adjusting her prosthesis and all maintenance, anytime - you just call" I had previously signed a "Vouchers for health aids" for NGA.
What for me this "company" produced was "just poor" as from the previous one. And there was a "problem contact" of this "technique" and when he "accidentally" came and "just did not have the necessary tools or materials themselves, even took the car."
Finally Me "failed to communicate at all" and "was the phrase" just a rehabilitation nurse DS, which is trying to convince me that "you do not have to invent and be satisfied with what I got."
"Adjusting and fine-tuning" of the prosthesis in the first weeks of wear, it is common practice and procedure, especially when it is called. "Prvoprotézu".
From matron DS, I learned that I was going to "Rehabilitation Institute" in Luži. S "company" that made me a prosthesis which has its headquarters in Luži too, is said to have agreed that to me there's an employee "visits, adjust my prosthesis and I'll be there soon learn to walk." I told her that I was going, but I want that when his "visit" was present either prosthetics doctor or another professional Rehabilitation Institute in Luži that will "oversee what he's doing, and especially want to have a witness, if I turn promised something, then you will not want to meet. " During my whole stay in Luži, me "no employee of the company visited" even though I already Luži phone twice contacted the company owner, talked with him, date of the visit and I told him, too, under what conditions I want to meet with him and that I informing and their attending doctor in Luži who agreed with this. That was probably the "reason" why has not complied with neither the deadline agreed even though it had a "firm" in the Rehabilitation Institute "a few hundred meters." I was ask to "edit" the prosthesis also in prosthetic company at the Rehabilitation Institute in Luži and I said to them, "Who did it to me". They rejected me, that "with this company they have nothing in common, whether we are finishing ourselves." As I then found on the Internet in any discussion posts, "I was not the only one who mněla with this crafty company a bad experience." I recently found out that "these rascals run their dubious company continues".
The only "rehabilitation" of which I graduated in Luži were about four shoulder massage, which I did not need a "joint" exercises, during which I anything new that I already knew, knew.
Ever since I was in LDN in Dačicích, I "strengthened and trained," and then I had a prosthesis, I have tried them "walk", despite the fact that I "did not suit" and I was literally the "bloody bruises and abrasions ". "For my part was definitely a great effort." But "against unwillingness, apathy and malicious conduct on the part of those from whom I expected help, I had no chance to succeed himself, but I did not give up."
After returning from Luze, I ordered the DS ward nurse at the orthopedist that "when I can not be a doctor recommendations, so you'll need to complain at the Medical Chamber and ask for help media". I asked her then so, too. "Key workers", which was known for its "open, nezáludným negotiations and dedicated approach to all clients without distinction" to me then to an orthopedist for rehabilitation escorted me to have a "witness about how there with me act ".
On the rehabilitation of orthopedic then surprised me with its presence matron DS, otherwise too deputy director, which I had never seen before. Probably got a "message" from the ward nurse in Vile.
Rehabilitation nurse me started "blaming" that "refuse professional rehabilitative care that my DS offer".
I said, 'I really need a professional, qualified prosthetic care, such as rehabilitation should know, "I reminded her, and her recent words when I asked her for her" opinion "or" opinion "orthopedist MD. Christmas Eve was inconvenient prostheses "I had. Then she told me "I do not understand prostheses and Dr. Christmas even less." "Ortoped" Christmas to me then, "once again refused to" write recommendations. The present head nurse was on hand rehabilitation and orthopedic surgeon at my side was the "key worker" by head nurse "reward long dirty look", which she apparently clear that not only the director but also "fell into a big disgrace" and later It gave both "very hard to feel."
I was "told" that "I can complain about where I want."
In the following days, I wrote to several media. "Interest" appeared for some time just by Czech Television. Journalist CT, there's black sheep, Mária Křepelková his colleagues made about me and "enterprise" in Luži, a short report to his talk show and besides me brokered contact Rehabilitation Clinic in Hradec Králové. During the filming of reports to me rehabilitation nurse, along with the director, "tried as much defame and falsely defame" before the workers CT, so I was glad when this "report" on TV after all just aired.
After that, I was "too fell into disfavor large" DS leadership, especially its director pi. Málková and "feel the consequences today."
The most important thing for me is the fact that "I was after more than three years unnecessarily spent in a wheelchair could get back on its feet, though not on his own and started to walk again."
                Thanks to such people as Mrs. Mária Křepelková of CT, a team of doctors and physiotherapists from the Rehabilitation Clinic in Hradec Králové, under the leadership of head physician. Marečka techniques and prosthetic companies Malik, Mr. Milan Lamla.
First I had to "change orthopedist" to me written by someone else, wiser
"Recommendation".

From the beginning of the operation in Vile, its personnel, including ward nurse, truly "professional". In addition to the "thoughtful discussions" to clients, they tried to liven up every day some interesting activities according to their wishes and possibilities that were in Vile. Particular attention in this direction donated mentally disabled clients.
The "well-being" here lasted less than two months. There was an "exchange" ward nurse and "boarded a nurse that the DS had exactly the best reputation", especially among the mentally handicapped, whose department had "made the station."
This new "head nurse" in Vile, I will hereafter be referred to as "Rocky".
Over time, there was also "exchange" other staff. "Minders" whose "main focus" of working hours has been caring for clients, were progressively 'released'. In their place was getting "staff rather simple thinking, which mainly including Rocky, was smoking on the porch Villas and simpleminded chatter about everything." These "debates" are "regularly participated in the" Head Nurse DS. The random listening to these "debates", the client could, among other things i know how it is "Rocky" every day "busy." Barely comes home from work to go to the pub to help you in your house operates with her husband and son, where "working late into the night" and what she must wretch that "drink" so they did not really "sleepless".
 "Rocky" had apparently because of "its popular and dedicated" staff every morning, among other things, cook and Sinou coffee. "Officiate" began around 9 am. Sometimes the "staggering" even at noon.
This "her fatigue experienced the" second day of major clients DS and especially the "one who somehow expressed his dissatisfaction with the situation in Vile". It used to be on her side and her staff from "false accusations" against such "cheeky". Ninety client who "survived the concentration camp" was "physically and mentally still fresh" when talking about the "Rocky" begins "the Gestapo". 
"The new caretakers" of the castle, were in Villas Director DS "relocated reward". This is at least one of them expressed and all that you literally "high esteem".

Clients in Vile were older people with various disabilities. In addition to the five mentally disabled, who unlike some present clients behave "normally", there were also those that because of his "aggressive" behavior towards other clients belonged rather to a "psychiatric facility". "Often i was physically assaulted and threatened with death" by such aggressive client. Keeping DS "done nothing to prevent this." Some of them, however, "enjoyed the special favor of the new personnel" and were among the "elect and inviolable in Vile".
"The situation is similar throughout the DS."
I mostly "spree Rocky and his staff" in Vile I felt again. Besides the fact that I rightfully complained about problems with my prosthesis, I especially pointed to "serious deficiencies in food hygiene, tolerating inappropriate to aggressive behavior towards other clients haves" and the fact that 'medical records and called. Individual plans' clients stored in the office-desk Villas "serves not only to entertain staff and their friends but also elect to clients, which is sometimes viewed any babysitter."   When I "person concerned" pointed right "in the act" and I replied by saying, "A do you have the witnesses? Mind your own business! "And slammed the door of the office to continue.
I was not the only one who is convinced of "own eyes" and who was "satisfied with the situation" in Vile. But when I wanted to write down and sign a complaint about such "negotiations" and other "deficiencies" in Vile, I stand alone.
Let me give you at least another two examples indicative of "intelligence and character" of former staff in Vile.
Someone on the staff brought in Villas "two large pots of datura in full bloom, and put them into the dining room." Clients' grumbled, but no one heard from loud ". It was a warm autumn day were over the doors and windows in the dining room opened, it was worse in the evening, when the door closed. I stayed in the dining room at night television or the Internet, and to me there had been one more mentally disabled clients. We both felt then "drowsiness, headache and nausea from datura smell". Several times I asked the head nurse and other members of staff moved to pots in the yard or in the basement, because it's "a poisonous plant that has nothing to do in the dining room." Every time she looked at me "puzzled" with the words "What are you making this up again when it's all like, just not for me"? About a week with me one more "reasonable caregiver" and managed to convince the pots cleaned the basement. For this I got the "write" in which, among other things wrote that "I do not like flowers" and the "write then inserted into the medical records as well as other absurd and fictional entries before".
"Another case worthy of a psychiatrist," I became the "Christmas season". The dining room was also a stove with oven and so the staff seem to agree among themselves that "bake at work to save energy at home." One evening when I was watching television in the dining room, I noticed how the dining room "peep" some members of staff who had "service". I did not know at all why? Suddenly "rozlítli" door, the lights came on, in the 'without any explanation rushed four minders, began to rattle dishes and yelling as if I was not there. " I told them that "we could say in advance what they want to do here" and that "I will complain to them!" I left the dining room, "accompanied by her uncomprehending looks and fatuous remarks". On the second day, however, I "puzzled" I watched when I was told that "this evening, I babysitter verbally attacked, because I was done writing again and if I get one more writing, so I throw the DS '!

"Was it to me at that time, really." Not only "environment and people" with whom I had to live "among which definitely not" but also "arrogance, ruthlessness and guile" from the staff and management of DS and "disinterest" City Hall. m. Prague, MPSV and other "responsible" I "asked for help" me "much worse". I could not sleep because I kept thinking about "how can something like this happen in the facility they call home, and how is it possible that these devices work such as Monsters DS director, head nurse, Rocky and others like them, even in leadership functions "?
So I decided to "visit" psychiatrist, who commutes to DS. Not because I wanted to ask for some "tranquilizers" but because I "naively believed" if he tells her about his "experience" in the DS, so "by virtue of his office" here, this "state" somehow "influence". I've never been a psychiatrist and I hope they will not go. Psychiatrist heard me, nodding, not promised anything and prescribed "Diazepam" I threw after three years without getting married on that one tablet. As I eventually learned "I was not alone," clients who went to this "doctor" s like "hope" and as I "did the same."
"Svépomoci" I have this "unfavorable condition" slowly got a "I've decided your case, robbing clients, illegal collecting fees in health care fees for import of medical aids, overall conditions in the DS and especially disinterest City Hall and other offices, too alert individual public protests. "
In one of my "individual protest" in front of City Hall, I received from Councillor p. Janecek, then responsible for the social area "calling cards" that "he looks at it and I still had some problems, so to call him."
Unfortunately, "did not look at anything," and when I then called him, he was "always very busy." Apparently he just wanted me to "get away with a banner" of the municipality. Mayor Bem let me again "illegally expel" a police officer from the plaza in front of City Hall, although it was the "individual and silent protest". Among other "industrial action", I was a participant in "demonstration against the citizens of Prague City Hall antisocial conduct." Then let Mayor Bem "at the last minute to dig up space in front of City Hall left a clatter of construction machinery !, although this" demonstration was published in advance. " It is "disgusting what today's so-called. Politicians, to allow people and incomprehensible that it let the people enjoy it."
But back to the villa. During my stay in the villa, there was also two "incidents".
The first "event" is a "serious injury" ninety lady that I have already mentioned once. It was at the time of issuance dinner, it was not "intentional" but "not have happened." "Caregiver" who "went as absentminded" apparently enjoyed some strong medicine "was not paying attention and brushed legs" of the old lady who fell and besides that he had cut himself on his hands, broke her "neck" in her thigh as she later found in the hospital. Shortly after the "accident" before this "very clever and fresh" client in LDN, probably "due to this injury," has died.
The "Write about this incident," as "the main reason of falling and subsequent injuries 'alleged" inappropriate footwear' clients. As "witnesses" were invited "a popular election" clients who this "collision could not really see, given as they sat and were absorbed by the food."
In the second "if" it was a "suicide" old client, who "was in the DS for a short time and it should be due to increased attention from the staff." At this time, "Rocky in Vile not, but on local circumstances, nothing has changed." I spoke with this legacy client about twice. "It made it clear that in Vile bored and not have nobody to talk." He was glad when he met with about the same old client in Vile, who was there "too bored" and together then went for walks in the park and the Castle, where there were more people, "coffee".
"The first weeks of similar facilities are for every new client" worst "and should therefore be new clients 'special care'. Especially "when he knows" that these clients also have "personal or family" issues. Z "personal experience" I know that "greater care in the first weeks there exists just on paper." With such a legacy client, he said i talk "Psychologist" DS. Personally, I have this so-called. "Psychologist" only "bad experience" even though I have him for advice or help himself and never asked "I do not know that it would help someone here."
A client who "committed suicide, had the day since the morning in a bad mood." They found him in the room after lunch, then when you come to an agreed meeting of his friend, who then reported the staff.
"Nejduchaplněji" the cleaning lady had preserved that it just "cut off", while the "present pečovatelka hysterically shouting nervously squeezed cellphone communication to give notice to the director." I shouted at her, "let lets mobile phone and try to give him first aid." She started on me "scream" that "it would not be a jerk in a wheelchair told what to do" and "squeezing" beyond mobile. That's upstairs "hurried" head nurse with any "device". I had a good feeling and I went to the Chateau. It was the first and so far the last time I was on the staff, "he shouted," I still for no one "write" get. Keeping the DS was "very well aware that not only the misconduct minders, which did not immediate first aid" but "bad, the whole staff access to this client, the first day of his stay in this home" and wanted the whole "event hush" .
The "write" about this "extremely sad event", were among the clients' again invite election "clients. As the "main reason for suicides" were given "family problems".
Although I am not "in connection with two incidents, filed a criminal complaint, nobody was interested to examine these cases and provide the right level."
To me "get rid of" at least in Vile, when they had no reason to me with DS "blew completely", director and head nurse called with. "Psychologist" DS, along with the staff prepared the Villas. "Meeting clients and employees Villas "in my day" individual protest "in front of City Hall in Prague. Perhaps it was because "I could not resist mainly false accusations by the leadership of DS and personnel Villas, before clients". From this "meeting" was done "write", I got up later and which were reported except "slanderous and false" statements from all employees present DS and "biased expression" especially so. "Haves". "Based on this record," I was the second day of Director DS announced that I was to "move" from the Villas of the Castle and "when he does not move voluntarily to captivity me without my permission!"   She gave me the no written decision and "refused to it closer to express the fact that she does not need "! 
I refused to move and "I told her," I consider it only as a "gross violation of a contract for the provision of social services, but also as a punishment and bullying, for that I have drawn attention to the situation in Vile". I did not produce "advocacy" or councilor from PCH p. Janiga, whom I informed about it the first day.
Because I refused to move from the villa, I had all week "to travel in a wheelchair" 3 times a day for a meal at the Chateau.
I moved here after a few times I really "soaked and I got a cold."
Although later called. "Social ombudsman" PCH, Mgr. Hal "recognized" that "in this case DS leadership acted under house rules and has been a breach of contract on the provision of social services," none of the "responsible" at City Hall to "" failed to take appropriate steps to prevent such conduct on the part of management DS, avoid continue. "
It was also the "first and last" what me Mgr. Hal "gave the truth" only in this case, but "recognized" other "serious misconduct" by the leadership of DS.
After I used "the results of its investigation" as "a basis for filing a criminal complaint," so I have not only she but none of PCH "did not agree" and all the other complaints "turned to my disadvantage."

                                                                       Again the castle.

After I was "forced to move" on the main subject DS - Chateau, I was "staying" on a single room with shared toilet and shower, with the old lady to the next room, which also belonged to the so-called. "Chosen" in DS and gave it to his "behavior" show.
To explain what I mean by the term "elect clients." They were and are mostly, relatives or acquaintances of employees DS someone who is here from the staff to provide "greater care" and they are part of the management DS "tolerated" as any "inappropriate sometimes aggressive behavior" towards other clients. He was here "case" older "sick" client was "indecent and aggressive" not only to clients but also to the staff, most of it has been seen in the dining room and yet it anywhere "migrated". For it was "close relatives", one of the executives DS. Another of its "relative with similar behavior", mainly to clients, there is still not a single such. If it was any other "ordinary" client, so it was definitely a first, "placed" into "mental institution" and then to "appropriate equipment". One such newly emerging "chosen one," presented to the Director of DS called. "The meeting users - clients," among other things, the words "this is my mom's best friend" and that apparently "hinted everyone how her to behave." This "client" was from a village about 2 km from the Heřmanova Městce "not to see her, she needed some care", I've had the opportunity to "make sure of that, with my own eyes," in Vile, where she lived. It was "at a time when DS was the only candidate for Prague". Similar "clients from around" here it is and more.
"The Chosen clients" are "very loyal" in relation to leadership - Director of DS "criticize ratios" in the DS and some of them are "very active in monitoring opinions and sentiments" among clients. After that, in addition to other "reward big favor" Director DS. "Most Active" of these often "aggressive" clients are sometimes repeatedly, "God knows what miracle" in the so-called elected. Committee users DS-Clients. "Elections Committee" held "face-off tickets to the pre-prepared, sealed boxes'.
The "Committee had your time powers comparable to the so-called powers. Civil Commission before 1989". Among other things, "to be his members present for dealing with offenses clients, suggesting the amount and method of punishment client", but mainly were present "in the payment of pensions to clients and to inspect payroll clients".
It was part of the management DS "knowingly violating the law on personal data protection, which ceased only after I pointed this out to both City Hall." This "gross violation of the law, was enshrined in the so-called. Internal Rules' DS, freely accessible to everyone, including so-called. Inspections, not only from PCH.
Maybe that's what I describe about the so-called. "Haves and the Committee users" seems someone "petty" unless a person due to illness or sedation "apathetic" to their surroundings, then "is not pleasant to be part of such an absurd events, no way to avoid it somehow. "
Not long after I moved to Castle, director of me along with "psychologist" DS "brokered work" at the company ERA-PACK sro, Chrudim. Only later did I "understand" them for me this "surprising willingness to find me a job." It is called. "Domestic work, sticking-repair bags" designed to perform animal feed, I had to perform in the room where I live. The conditions for carrying out this work, were verbally agreed with me in the room, in the presence of the director, two employees of the company ERA-PACK that bring me as soon as "contract of employment". I was glad to "earn something and not be bored here." By the staff ERA-Pack, which for me took his bags repaired and brought another to repair, I heard "no complaints" on its work. But when I wanted him to tell me he "finally" brought "employment contract" and "as agreed", I finally received from him "every evasive and vague answers."
After ten days, she brought me a social worker segment DS "employment contract" with the company ERA-PACK, without a copy, stamped and signed by the employer. She wanted me to this "employment contract" signed soon, "she had to take care of others and sends the Treaty employers, because otherwise you'll have to send mail at his own expense."
A similar "procedure when they want the client to DS to sign something, without receiving a copy, there is" normal ".
At that time I was this "social worker" said he, "I want to first read what they were signing, and I want to copy." She was my "requirement visibly taken aback," let me "Contract" and left. When I read this' contract 'read' I was surprised again and I definitely too visibly. " This "employment contract for a definite period", which I got for signing 17. 12. 2008 was "valid from 8. 12. 2008 to 28. 2. 2009 probation three months." "The employment relationship was shorter than the test time"! Furthermore, this "Agreement" among other things stated: "The operation of the plant operator, will perform at the headquarters ERA-PACK sro, piston 821, Chrudim. He was familiar with the work environment in which the work will take place, with the rights and obligations associated with employment contracts, internal regime, with legal and other regulations to ensure the safety and health at work, fire regulations and other documents, such as, ISO directive,


Conditions of employment, wage regulations. Employee claims to be able to meet these requirements and that assigned work under the contract is responsible for his physical and mental abilities and state of health. "
At that time I did not know that some "Piston" exist. Chrudim I knew just from the window of the ambulance when I occasionally rode at polyclinics or if once in a while I went to the Labour Office (LO), where I was registered. "The only work", which I had with ERA-Pack finished, the " fix-bonding bags in the room, where I live. "
On the second day after I got this 'contract' hands, I visited a lawyer Labour Office in Chrudim to her about this "tricky negotiations" informed. For phone calls, which ÚP lawyer tried to get some more information of your company ERA-PACK concluded that "the preparation of employment contracts contributed Director DS, though I had to do was not authorized." Lawyer Up "recommended" workers ERA-pack with you on the phone to me already arranged and commenced work, entered into an "Agreement for work." The lawyer also told me that "I did well when I did not sign the original contract and I'm not the only one who recently got a firm ERA-PACK, into similar problems."  
Z "Regional Labour Inspectorate" in Hradec Králové, where I later turned his "complaints about the behavior of" firm ERA-PACK, I got the answer that "no violation of the Labor Code did not, though I did not sign an employment contract. "
           The next day, after visiting LO, I "social worker" DS informed "opinion" LO lawyer, I told her that "Working to sign the contract, its behavior and process management DS, deemed sneaky and trying to get me away from the DS even at the cost that I would be signing the contract of employment got into big trouble and I have to complain about this meeting. "
In January, 5. 1. 2009 I went on a "rehab clinic" to Hradec Králové. The employee ERA-pack, I was "finished, when they return I will continue working and the remaining material remains yet to locked room."
When I was 23. 1. 2009 from Hradec returned, work materials out of the room "was gone." The charge nurse told me that "material drove employee ERA-pack and the director told her that I know what's going on." Of course, "I knew nothing." It took a week before I found out about that supposedly exists "Minutes of Extraordinary Events", which is the social segment DS. The "write" it was stated that "I was by ERA-PACK advance of all personnel informed as DS I did not communicate." "Interesting," was the date when the material was taken, 6th 1, 2009 , therefore, the very next day after I went to Hradec Králové. As "witnesses" were named Director of DS, a top and a head nurse. "The name of the company employees ERA-PACK, there was no mention of". From the worker's "firm", which drove me material, I then learned that "the material was taken at the instigation of the Director DS". Shortly afterwards, if I were to ask your doctor for "transportation by ambulance" to Hradec Králové and back, to test a new prosthesis "dismissed" me head nurse, who was sitting at the doctor's words: "When you can complain to us in Prague, so you too can reach for the prosthesis bus to Hradec ". "Nice example of human and social sensibilities nurses" who practiced for many years also the "deputy director" DS.
I did not write about yourself for going to present the "Experience" other clients DS.
The client, rather they are elderly, with higher education, has apparently "sizofrenii". I've never seen him "furious" or that someone "screaming", trying to avoid "all those aggressive drunks and provocateurs" who are in the DS. On "The meeting users' occasionally uttered some" valid criticisms of the shortcomings "in the DS and the apparently" displeased "leadership DS. She lives in a small room, which leads into the room, which serves as a "lounge". The "cold" period "before the door of his room" in the common room, staff "built several large, heavy pots with plants" were among them "widely open, thorny Aloe". This client, then when he wanted to get out of the room, he had slowly "making way" between these plants and was often "scratched" by Aloe. "He asked the staff and management of DS to be heavy pots shifted, but he was not satisfied." The knife against some leaves Aloe "partially trimmed so as not to them" painfully scratching ". Doing "their conduct does not threaten anybody."
After that, he was "placed for two months in a psychiatric hospital" (PL) in Havlickuv Brod. When he returned, he wanted to know "who his placement in PL ordered and handed" Criminal complaints about the misuse of psychiatry. " At the Municipal Police Department learned that his "location in PL ordered matron DS, but in the meantime" retired, so that they can not do anything. " Another "incomprehensible conduct" DS employees against this "sick client" is recent. "The Wall" rooms that client, separating the room from the living room, which consists of "ordinary brick partition wall", put "two big targets, throwing magnetic darts". Do these targets will come "several clients, under the leadership of activation worker" DS, once a week, two hours' continuous peg ". "Tapping the arrows at the target" is very good to hear, twenty yards up the room "behind two closed doors." What does it have to "act" on the man "lying just behind the thin walls" and "sick sizofrenii" being "strong antidepressant ice"?
Another case.
More than seventy client "severe stroke on half his body paralyzed," yet "very alert and mentally fit." He was "move on" from a separate room from the Villas, like I once did, because "too pointed to serious deficiencies in Vile.
Under the leadership DS, but it "moved" because several "pee" in the sink. "However, the reality was somewhat different." It was true that he had "some problems with urination," but when she wanted to be in the DS "loaned rookie" who would wear them all the time, so he refused to lend him. And when he was outside the room, so it staff "watched when it it comes to him and if it manages to pee?"   When he was "caught" and that "Writing wrote and gave him to sign it." A "similar to him kept after moving to the lock." At the same time, I know that "most of the staff who watched it because" the Castle "spilling urine but not others feces from clients into the sink."

They were here by clients who "pee wherever she went" very often they are without 'napkin-pants "because nobody gave them is, and nobody is worth it" punish ".
This client, who always something "created", mainly made of wood, was also "active beekeeper." At the chateau was 'punishment' accommodation in a room with a client whose "purpose of life was probably just eat and sleep," which led to "the bad relations between the two."
This "client-beekeepers," was the termination of the provision of social services, because several times to pee in the toilet sink, bowl because it is not fast enough and did not want to pollute the floor. "   As the director herself expressed, "I did it because I It punished for it. " She said that "in the presence of members of the so-called. Inspection" of the CCP, which "came because of complaints that client to reckless behavior Director DS, against him. Member of the "inspection" PhDr. Mrnková that made ​​"clerk" of what was said, then "intentionally forgot to write to write words of director of punishment" and "reluctantly and not literally is inscribed there, only came to my request." I was at this "discussion" when "is present on the client and to the great displeasure of the other attendees, mainly Director DS". "Foolish and incomprehensible behavior was" the other two present, so-called. "Psychologist" DS and a second member of the "Inspection" Mgr. Schindler, who "exchanged with silly gestures and remarks to the address of a severely disabled client who is difficult due to their disability and expressed that he was reading the reasons for their complaints." Both "stopped up after I warned them" that "this it is no laughing matter." For me it both "glared".
"Disgusting was the behavior and reactions Director DS, the client's objection," who said that "remembers that would pee in the sink as many as accused". At that time, "the director took from the table in front of him described several sheets of paper and throwing them one by one on the table in front of the client", saying: "You signed it, you signed it?" "You are sui juris, so you would have to know what you are signing!" Personally, I am the director of "experienced similar behavior." I heard it in her "normal".
This client was a DS "fired" and after the last day of his stay in the DS "in vain to ask for help and advice in the seat of the Czech Helsinki Committee in Prague and at City Hall," he returned in the evening to Heřmanova Městce, which "was not allowed to enter DS or for the minimum personal hygiene equipment. " Then lived for several weeks in a rented old house, where among other things "himself having to hunt for wood and coal to nezmrznul".
Do DS, was a "hot summer" placed an elderly lady, a former employee PCH. This lady did have some "mental problems", whilst "well aware of what he was saying and was not aggressive." Was housed in the attic of the castle, where is, apparently because of "poor quality" of insulation "in the winter cold and summer very hot."
This "new" client, from the beginning of their stay in the DS complained that her due to her "health problems breathing," living in the attic 'fail' and so most of the day, when the "big fuss" spent in the park, or the courtyard.
On the "substandard housing" warned the director and so on. "The meeting users 'and also asked her for help in solving their" personal problems "associated with the" health severely disabled' husband, who had given the "housing problems" which had Prague, relocate "temporarily" to Slovakia, to their relatives. He therefore asked the director, "that would be a possibility to be able to live in DS with her husband, because it would be the husband" psychologically very helpful. " Director DS, her "clients before the promised assistance." That's "request" was registered as the "Minutes of the meeting users', which was further stated that" the client to be addressed to the social worker, who would be in it should help. "
Shortly after coming to the DS, this was a client with "stolen larger sum of money." The client of this "theft" announced not only the staff but also to the Municipal Police Department in Heřmanova Městci what seemed "very alienated" Director DS. "Theft of money" in this DS, are nothing "unusual". And by "robbed" DS leadership "requires that these clients have robbed at least two witnesses that were robbed that dealt with that at all."
It's not long been in the DS "caught stealing" a client that was because "fired" from the DS, and although it was "reasonably suspected from other similar theft" in the DS, director "did nothing to that person was filed The criminal complaint, even if it is her duty ", not only by the so-called." house rules "DS, but also the" statutory obligation ". "She did this despite the fact that it robbed demanding clients." By the Director of DS, there is "a big effort to hush up all the unpleasant events and complaints, regardless of how it has an impact on people with disabilities". That has "great support mainly officials of the Department of Social and Health Care City Hall."
Client "of the attic," which announced the theft of money to the police, very "soon felt the wrath Director DS". Several times I spoke of this client, so I said, among other things, that when she went to the director that it "recalled the promise made at the Meeting users' and gave her director" snapped ", saying:" If you do not like here, anytime need to go to the hostel, I do not hold you here, you will be well on DS stay only until the end of July 2012, because you are not our target group and whether there will be staying with your husband about it, yet decides "! This client was of such a "meeting" Director DS "visibly very upset even though I'm told." I happened to be seen by the client on the day when her from DS "taken away" and I wanted to ask, "where they take her?" She replied that "perhaps to Prague, as it said," did not know more.
Once here, too, "similarly moved" client who "banned" talk about how they will "move" and also did not know at all where "?


Daily "life" in the "home for the elderly" (DS) in Meřmanově Městci, whose founder is the City of Prague, is different than that which is captured in photographs from various events DS, which are published on his website.

DS spaces are divided into departments by illness and disability clients. In fact, this "division exists just on paper." Clients' obviously mentally ill and aggressive "towards other clients are accommodated in wards where there are clients who behave" normally "and who then" ruined "his" aggressive "behavior stay in DS. "Aggressive" Clients choose their "victims" among clients who are "lonely" and among those who are "not satisfied" with the stay in the DS, because these "malcontents" then "have no advocacy" as the staff and u DS leadership. "The client who complained in writing to the situation" in the DS is in front of other clients, staff and management "described as eternal complainant, who complains illegally and damaging the reputation of the DS." Neither of them, however, other clients "do not tell the real reasons for complaints," like "eternal complainant".

When a client is complaining to the staff or management of "word of mouth", so these complaints "are not registered and does not deal with." Sometimes DS leadership, "proceeds similarly", is written complaints.

In addition to complaints about "aggressive behavior" of some clients that are "complaints about the quality of the finished dishes, pastries and fruit." It is obvious that the DS is "cooked and baked especially for clients and separately for staff and especially management DS", otherwise "cooks" had been long overdue "notice". This is mainly on meat. Sometimes it is so "tough and sinewy, this is not cut with a knife", let alone that it was "chew" because most clients are not even "replacement teeth." "Rolls" are for breakfast or dinner, are "rubber", even though it several clients complained. On such a "dog" can do "node". Then it is not surprising when such a "dog" someone "chokes". If at the "Meeting clients 'client complains about the" quality food "and does not add to it" sufficient number "of other clients, so this line DS' complaint does not address, even though it is valid." Sometimes the "answers" leadership DS on "food quality" at least "ironic". When a client complained about the "hard apples", which was given for a longer period of time, slowly every day at lunch as "afternoon tea" and joined with several other clients with similar complaints they received "advice" from the director DS that "the fruit are let stand for several days to soften ". This "apples when they were so hard they had to lie within a few weeks to soften." "Interesting" is also offer hot meals for dinner when a client "can often choose" eg. The "beef pepper rice" or "Krkonosskie sponges" or other similarly "heavy meal." U "cold" dinner, that are different "purchased, spicy spreads" or "strongly flavored salads Majolka". "Jídelníček DS, is compiled in collaboration with a nutritional counselor," as stated in the "Internal Order" DS.

"The floor dining room for clients are serviced in the morning and only once a day." Despite the "weekend" probably "or nezamete" because "it is normal on Monday for breakfast, you can by food residues on the dining room floor, plan meals DS from Friday to Sunday." Director DS, this "condition justifies the lack of cleaners". Late in the evening and at night, the dining room becomes a "haunt cockroach-Rusak," like the hallway on the first floor, where "remain overnight scraps of food." According to the Director DS "These cockroaches are everywhere where food is handled and you can not completely prevent it." The "background" kitchen "daily help out clients with lung disease who moments before cleaning up around the bins, ashtrays or cleaning the large courtyard and without wash their hands, or somehow modified, cleans clean várnice or other dishes for serving meals" . These "henchmen" were behind this their "efforts", even "praised" the director of DS.

In the dining room for a long time used on tables larger porcelain mugs for inserting cutlery and napkins that there cleaners always put their few hours before serving. Several clients who "s personal hygiene, do not worry, have used these mugs to drink tea from várnicích in the dining room." Remove cutlery and napkins from the cup, drank tea without rinsing then put back into mugs cutlery and napkins. Staff, nor the DS, such

"Negotiations mind," apparently because "they wore cutlery from dispensing food boxes and similar mugs on the table did not." Mugs Cutlery removed after someone apparently this cup, broke a pane of glass on the table.

When I'm on these "sins", warned in writing "the regional health stations" in Hradec Králové, I received a reply from them that "they were made to control that these shortcomings did not find". I do not know where these "checks" were in DS, but it will be with them about the same as the so-called. "Controls" the Prague City Hall (PCH) that "it's never found nothing."

I once such "control" of City Hall, among other things, pointed out that the DS is still used "canvas" towels, which are changed once a week and to our customers, "except for dirty hands and wipe noses and other body parts and accordingly the towels also look ". Then me a member of this "control" PCH, once "mentioned Master," he said, "You are right, sir Janiga, but I will write that we found nothing."

"Nejpodivněji" it seemed at the time when the chateau was "sometimes Quarantine" doorknobs were "wrapped in paper soaked in disinfectant and in the dining room, the kitchen or on the toilet, hung" linen towels. "

When I was at the "Castle" moved to another room, I did not have a shared toilet and shower with a client-wife, I got a "room" where the "hallway", apart from the next room, yet "little room with no ventilation" with shower and WC. This "small room", used the staff as "a repository for used diapers," where he had the "purpose" built on land "plastic laundry basket with lid and ventilation holes on the sides." "Used diapers were inserted directly into the bin without using a plastic bag" and because "due to ventilation", were on the toilet door is still open, "stink that there spread was almost feel throughout the corridor." It took several "weeks" before I "had obtained" that this "store" and moved next month, this "cubbyhole" ventilated before she started to serve its "original purpose". "The room", where I live, was "long stale" and on one wall was a "visible mold". I told the nurse station, which my "closet showing off" that "until the wall does not remove mold from walls and draining at least, so it will not move." Head nurse tried situation "sugarcoat" the words: "I ask you a little bit of mold. It is everywhere today. We have a home in the kitchen too still blight, and what can I do anything. "I told her that" if she has a home mold, so is her thing, but I will not live in it, "and went on" its existing "room, where in a moment" without knocking stormed Director DS, along with sister station ". "Infuriated" Director DS, to me, "she began, her voice rising," that "what I do not like again, I can be happy that I got a single room, which was painted a year ago and for me, it will not paint any moment!" I managed to get it to "convince" to go first, "look how that one room looks like."

 When we arrived at the "moldy closet", you could see that someone, probably a head nurse, tried to "scrape mold on the wall" that was there even though I keep seeing. After the "next minute haggling" director "reluctantly agreed to give up just paint the room, but then I just move it as a room where I live now, is already Reservation and has to move in there new client!" Similarly, the "damp and moldy" there are other rooms on the ground floor, "because of neglected maintenance of sewerage network" in the castle courtyard. When "the more it rained," water leaked from the patio door to the hallway on the ground floor and probably also into the cellars, where "soaked into the walls" and gradually gets to the ground floor. In some rooms on the ground floor, it must because "hew" and then "cast" the plaster on the wall.

When I was in the "closet" gradually "settled down", I wanted to give me the room for some locker because one-piece was little. They brought me a "box" that except that it was a "rickety", also "smelled terribly myšinou". Although I "cabinet" to "counsel" charge nurse "several times thoroughly misled" water and "disinfectants" I was unable to get rid of her "smell myšiny". Finally, they brought me another "box" that was indeed too "rickety but did not stink."

Laundry basket "used diapers", was transferred opposite, across the hall, where there was a bathroom and a common toilet. Clients who went there, then still a "long complained about the smell" than it was in this "mopping plenkového basket", inserted a plastic bag, to "alleviate the odor," which it was based.

On the DS department on the ground floor, where I was staying after "moved" from the Villas, lived 16 clients, mostly walking with the aid of a stick, walker, or wheelchair. Nevertheless, it was 30 meters long corridor of the department, "even a piece handrail on the wall so that he could Client for nausea snag on something solid." "Handles" on the wall of the corridor of the department and "oblique ramp" into the corridor, were "installed" after I staff and management DS "several times warned" that I will "complain to the supervisory bodies." "Long" Then I was "the target of various notes and hints" from the staff even before other clients, such as .: "Again, I was displeased with something." "So now there's railing I have." "Cosi again think of next" and the like.

"Similar reactions", mainly by the leadership of DS and disinterest PCH, I experienced even after I pointed out the "outdated fire alarm" at the castle. For many years there was apparently "normal" that the corridors Chateau several times a week and maybe 2 or x 3 x per night, strong electric bell rang alarm fire without burning something somewhere. Keeping DS obviously wanted this enterprise, diversify clients' uneventful life "in the DS. Similarly, the "bullshit", I experienced as a soldier basic services. According to the director of the DS and PCH, "Fire alarm was installed according to regulations and the occasional start, nothing unusual." At the same time, "an unexpected wake-up call" clients could have been avoided by signaling would be launched in the first night room service, which would first examine whether it is not again a false alarm. Every time that it took some time before staff opened the sealed vault in the office on the first floor, where the keys were on the ground floor of the gatehouse to switch off the fire alarm, which resides there. How many times I've seen, "first went off alarms because it was assumed that this is again a false alarm."

The website "Home for the elderly", inter alia, that "some rooms are equipped with bathroom, including shower." But the reality is that these "separate sanitary facilities used by clients only in isolated cases." "Most" of the local client has different "physical problems" and might not be in a wheelchair or walk with the aid of "walkers" or stick. Due to the "narrow door and small spaces" of these "separate sanitary facilities" with a walker or wheelchair, clients do not reach inside. Of those clients who are confined to a wheelchair or walker and get into this "sanitary facilities" to be able to use the toilet, only a few individuals dare to use "narrow, metal and slippery shower", which would have problems with movement and healthy person. So the "most clients are forced to use communal showers and toilets, and sometimes, even though it pays to have a bathroom, but can not not use his fault."

Here are a few other examples of "economic and efficient conduct" leadership DS.

"Designated Smoking Area", which was originally located on the first floor, in a room next to the room of clients due to client complaints were moved to a room on the ground floor, which until then had served as a room for clients. In this room because "had crashed" bathroom - toilet and shower. After a long time, this room was "rebuilt again" so to serve its original purpose, housing for clients. "Designated Smoking Area" was then stationed there "where there is no danger of fire and which should have been from the very beginning." The ground floor rooms in the palace, which was previously used as a "dumping ground of various junk" and that was the only entrance from the courtyard.

In this DS "normal" that after each building modification or reconstruction must make these repairs apparently poorly paid work. In addition to the "reconstruction Villas" it was necessary "reconstruction" attic locks, repairing castle facade, floors, laying floor tiles for outdoor garbage containers. On all renovations and repairs in DS is always involved the same "firm".

The latest "crafting skills", one of these "companies", in addition to the "built-in WC" into the next room, and "reconstruction" shared bathrooms and toilets, and the associated measuring several "reconstruction" waste sewerage network in this department. After "a few weeks of suffering", where clients were in this department, "exposed to noise and dust from these reconstructions", was in a shared bathroom, which was under the floor "outcome" of the waste, finally tiles and bathroom installations. "Only then find these artisans that they waste flows backwards, pipes tendency has reversed. " So it was "more days of dust and noise addition."

In the park, which the original owners' family Kinský built and created several centuries, "the" in recent years cut down trees more than in the forest that is designated for logging. " Not just because of this "cutting" the paths in the park so "damaged". "Repair park paths" used "not very useful" material "gravel", so when "it rains", park visitors prefer to walk across the lawn. It is "safer" and for "bikers" who park "ride". Castle park in addition cyclists "shortens the journey by car 'houses and Director of DS and her friends, even though they are at the park entrance" warning signs "on which" prohibits the entry of cyclists and motor vehicles, under penalty of CZK 50 000 ". "Signed under this Regulation," Home for the Elderly "capital Prague. According to the Police in Meřmanově Městci, these "signs only Information".

Only "for the last growing season, it has cut down about 150 trees in the castle park." Among the felled trees, and trees are "protected monument". According to some "stumps" which had not yet remove them see that they were "trees as continuous and healthy." According to the "responsible local and regional institutions" and, according to Director DS "everything is fine, the trees are strictly controlled in this park, which was included on the European list, contested illness and felling is necessary for recovery." Prague City Hall "unlimited Farm" Lock, along with the park has "more than 60 years." The current director of the DS "directors" since 1987 "since often enough to have to perform a similar function, the red book and party cadre assumptions". "How is it possible that after so many years suddenly find that a good portion of the park must be cut down, due to illness trees"?

The chateau park in nearby Choltice, are "still" trees that perhaps "has been standing just willpower and nobody nekácí", although in this park also someone cares.

I once heard somewhere, "saying" that "when a person wants and has the right contacts and everything goes."

Keeping DS clients' guides to conserve water and energy, "devoted to the operation of the DS. Some clients are getting so "confused" that other clients who are slower and in the dining dojídají food, turning off lights, although the dining room is "gloomy" during the day. These "šetřílkové confusion" among clients off "laggards" in the dining room and the speakers' Zámeckého Radio "which at meals listen because it is a" regulation "leadership, which is" also saves electricity. " Such "conduct" just leads to a "misunderstanding" between clients. "Wind" in the rooms is led by DS "recommended 1 x per day, essentially a short time to avoid wasting heat energy". Because of this "neplýtvání" can be for some rooms "be blindfolded, by smell." Apparently "due to water saving most clients not flush" toilets in a row and "washes up just once a week, under the supervision of the staff when it's mandatory."

And now about "saving energy" from the management and staff of DS.

The castle, which is "in the evening and at night very well see," because they stand on the floodlit square, about 10 meters from the "well lit" of the road, "after dark, illuminated by strong reflectors 8" from the side of the road, despite not being a "particularly historically valuable memory."

In the hallway, on the ground floor, is a "niche with a tiny pool", which apparently served in the past as "waterhole for horses and cattle in the barn," which was the site of today's "canteen for clients and staff." Director DS, this "waterhole" left "mount" pump and lighting. They then filled with water, and since then, it would be "lit waterhole spouted" apparently "constantly in the winter-summer, day-night" if it "šetřílkové confusion" among clients, sometimes at least temporarily turned it off, next to wall mounted switch. This "fountain", which certainly also consumes considerable amount of energy is' kitsch, moreover useless "because the corridor where it is located is" cold even in summer. " A similar "even more wasted electrical energy glutton" who "runs continuously from spring to autumn, is outside in the so-called." Oasis "between the two wings. Circular "flowerbed" diameter of about 8 m, which is in the castle courtyard, leaving the DS leadership from spring to fall every day "water" strong stream of water from a hose "more than an hour," so it is "more water in the courtyard than flower-beds ".

Keeping DS then the "Meeting users 'repeatedly' calls for water saving, tightening taps".

"Saving water" must cleaners in DS. Some of them apparently this' recommendations are taken very seriously "and" with one bucket of water can clean up several departments ".

The castle is accessible to clients' computer connected to the Internet. "

To avoid "verbal or physical attack" on the part of the "aggressive" clients, both in my DS has already happened several times, go to "My Computer" (PC) to the first floor of the castle until after dark, when the halls usually moves if only staff that has the night shift. PC is located in the hallway on the first floor, away from the rooms clients to disturb them.

There is "nothing unusual" that "deserted corridors" in the first floor in the evening to hear the speakers are turned on "Zámeckého Radio", which are stationed there. Connecting doors between the corridors evening, even in winter "wide open" including large double-leaf doors that lead to the main staircase, through which it most "stretched". Sometimes, there are overnight and opened the window, although it is still "heating season". Because "leaking" or doors and windows of the offices on the first floor, it is evening in these corridors and especially for PC 'drafts as průchoďáku ". It also "thanks to" some "leadership enough uninformed and little chápavých carers' that when the evening walks down the corridor, the door does not close, although the door on each side of the" great sign, indicating the necessity of closing the doors ". I can only then nothing else than these "little compassionate caretakers" always "alert" to behind closed doors, at least for the time sitting at the PC. This "constantly drawing attention, they evoke overt resentment against my person."

On the ground floor, the hallway department where I live, was due to "saving energy", about three months ago, "lowered ceiling" of about 40 cm and the previous "normal" lighting was installed "lights that are illuminated only by sensors, which respond to movement "in the hallway. Clients who live here and go in the evening after a long corridor, must "keep moving and does not rest" because "otherwise find themselves in utter darkness." The constant "switching on and off, also does not too well on the psyche of old and sick people."

At one end of the hall are "self-opening" doors that too "respond to the sensor". Besides these "self-opening" the door is "built" housing in which the staff stored among other things, as well as bedding for clients. When the staff is doing something in the closet and "flashing lights in the hallway and doors flying, maybe fifteen minutes here and there." Similarly, the "magic" happen even when cleaning the hallway. I doubt that this "technical improvements" leadership DS "saves some energy." In addition to "wear out" only "expensive sensors and light bulbs' lighting, but also the" sensors and self-closing mechanism "door. Within the space where the day someone moves, similar to "technical improvements" definitely "not" and "consumption of electricity" more "ups".

On the other side of the corridor, on which "reduced the ceiling to save energy," the older double glazed door leading out from the lock. These " locked door, labeled as an emergency escape route in case of fire, are still barred pot ". ventilation windows on this door is open too much "continuously". When in the room, at the end of the corridor lived "chosen one" client, who "rightly complained about, strong and unpleasant odor, which spread for several years" from the client from the room across the hall, keeping DS "instead made ​​arrangements to eliminate the cause this odor, let the client that can ventilate window emergency exit door, which was then day and night, wide open even in the largest freeze and radiators in the corridor were released on maximum ".

From the "founder" PCH, it would certainly be "beneficial" if "at least a little interested in the real economy" of equipment such as local DS, including whether they are called. 'Reporters' vehicles' in these DS "really only used for its purpose and not just on weekends. " For a long time the DS had one behind the glass "referentského" car "parking pass ZTP", which is entitled, among other things, to stand at places designated for the disabled. But I have never seen that in this car drove "disabled".

It is obvious that "making the director of a home is a very good job, without fear of any checks, without accountability, with vast powers and possibilities of large salary, of which the common man has no idea."

It's no wonder then that example. "Former Director of Social Affairs and Health" PCH ing. Matulová after "finished" at City Hall, did not want to do "nothing less than a director in one of the homes for the elderly", whose founder is the City Hall .

It would have to be some other "founder" to this "home" performed "real control" and not the City of Prague, where "disappears forever in the tens of millions without it for someone really punished."
As for the "complaint" in the DS, you can not complain, "verbally" by anyone with a staff, or "writing" at the leading social and health care sector DS. "Oral" complaints "are not registered at all." The last "case unrecorded complaints and drawing and modeling reality" is 18. 3. 2014. That day was the "meeting users' DS. Complaint "concrete" clients, the poor quality of the bread ", was" minutes of the meeting "is listed as" anonymous complaint that the box Trust, to which one has left. " In addition to the "bad bread and pastries", it is also "rotten fruit", to which clients often complain without that made ​​some "write". The "record" in this "meeting", but "not intentionally" complaint client to "dangerous stairs" in the hallway and rooms in the attic of the Castle. These "steps are inadequately labeled" as well as "crooked and bumpy" The floor of this hall, are "dangerous" for clients who live there. Other "specialty" of the "attic" is a "step about 20 cm down inside the room, behind the door to the room." A client who goes to the room, opened the door and "forgets to step into the vacuum." "Injuries of this reason, do not record too."   Keeping DS "relies on the fact that clients are afraid to speak up." "It is incomprehensible how anyone could this loft Zkolaudovat there and allow accommodation for the elderly, sick and disabled clients "?
From my own experience I know that it is "not registered and does not address" or some "written" complaints, especially not those in which the client complains about the employee DS or complaint, in which the client refers to "other serious deficiencies" related to the operation DS . It happens, too, that if ever "Founder" PCH "respond" to a "complaint for reckless conduct" Director DS, or "long-term serious deficiencies which lead DS does not address" and this "complaint gets to investigate Director DS again. And when PCH some "control" sends, so this "control does not detect anything."
Please provide at least two "examples of controls", from City Hall.
First
In December 2010, I had except for "violations of sanitary regulations" in the dining room and kitchen DS, complained about the use of "cloth towels" and at a time when the DS, "declared quarantine". In January 2011, came to "control" of the CCP. One of these "Mgr. controllers ", which I do not 'really did not present", he came to me in the room with the fact that "they are here because of my complaint and I show him where the hanging cloth towels, which I wrote." I showed him these towels, right in the hall rooms where I live across the hall on a shared toilet and in the nearby "kitchen". I pointed out to him too, like it is on the first floor of the "Castle" and towels are changed just "once a week". The Mgr. Controller ", I answered and said," You are right, sir Janiga, but I will write that we found nothing. " It was a "ruthless mockery to the eyes of the person who rightfully complained about something and hoping for some remedy things." It's also "further evidence of antisocial behavior, CCP officials."
2nd
In 2010, I had several times complained of "aggressive behavior" of the client, who lived in the next room. I was not the only one who complained about this "aggressive client-alcoholic" and who "vulgarly cursed and threatened to kill him while he brandished a knife." But I was the only one who complained of "writing" and also because I "called" Police. "It was my first time in this home for a similar attack out of fear for his life, called the police." However, the "Record of the police presence, for this reason, the DS is only one." Director DS, to justify the fact that "they (DS) may not make these Minutes." In the case of the "client-alcoholic", but equally "to any investigation by the Police did not." This "client always escaped before police arrived and it never bothered him somewhere in the neighborhood to look for the next day or something to investigate."   Said "client-alcoholic," lived in the next room with the other "similarly afflicted friend from Skid Row," which was' drunk every day, even though he had a strong diabetes and used several drugs. " "For over a year I have been exposed to the aggressive behavior of these Alcoholics, especially the first one, who threatened to kill him and other clients." In addition to "the room where they lived, it seemed like every day in the cafeteria fourth group pricing." There was "nakouřeno a bottle of beer and hard liquor, rolled on the ground, not to mention the very dirty shared toilet in the hallway both rooms." "Often, I was afraid to go out from the room." I was at that time still "much confined to a wheelchair" and these "clients" next room "raged since four in the morning, because it woke alcoholic thirst." Although I had "several times a day because of staff called, is not about a single entry." The first "aggressive of these clients, many times for no reason, verbally attacked vulgar and volunteers DS", which went for DS clients to visit and sometimes even came to visit me. Although I have about these "vulgar looks towards volunteer workers" several informed leadership DS, doing nothing to make it happen again. " Because of the leadership of DS "was not even attempt to deal with aggressive behavior of these clients," I sent in mid-2010, "the complaint due to this procedure" by the leadership of DS, to address the so-called. "Social ombudsman" PCH, which was at that time Mgr. Hale.
On 15 9. 2010 came into DS "investigative committee" composed of representatives of "social ombudsman" and "social union" PCH, Mgr. Hall, Mgr. Štědron, Mgr. Schindler. Two days before the arrival of this "commission" were "aggressive" clients "instructed" deputy ward nurse about how to "testify". Part of the "lessons" I "accidentally" heard through the open door, when I returned from lunch. "The Deputy" these "clients patronizing", with these words: "When workers come Magistrate, you both still say that you are worthy, doing nothing to him, and he still offends you." "I remember, and you have to repeat it all the time." "We can confirm it." Later, "when confronted by" this "representative" following his words, "brazenly reneged." "Educate" clients "how to testify," DS leadership "was considered very important." "Thinking eloquence and intelligence" of these two clients were mainly "as a consequence of long-term alcohol consumption of all kinds, severely limited" and "the most decent word" they knew was "Dude".
On 15 9. 2010, in the afternoon, came "commission of inquiry" PCH me in the room with the fact that "they are here because of my complaints about the aggressive behavior of clients to the next room."
But I barely finished my first sentence of "aggressive behavior of clients" and that "leadership is not interested to solve this problem," Mgr. Hale after his "note" that "similar behavior among clients in facilities such as DS, can not be avoided, change the subject," and started asking questions: "If you've got some work to do"? "What am I doing in their free time?" Etc. "She praised me that I can do nice pottery and wood carving." "Audience" and "investigation" of this "commission" for me "ended Have a nice stay in DS."
"Surprise me", in the form of the "Final Report of the investigation of my complaint," which have already made mention of "Master of City Hall, came by mail. 18. 10. It was written in 2010 and signed by the members of this "commission of inquiry" PCH. It states inter alia that "my complaint to the aggressive behavior of clients is unjustified", while "according to the testimony of the accused me of clients, it is I who these clients attacks, insults their dignity and interferes with their right to privacy"! I do not know if these clients ever "interviewed" but "with them in the room certainly was not."
"On the basis of the" Final Report ", my director DS" gave a written warning, a gross violation of house rules. " In this "Warning" Me Director DS "again openly intimidates psychiatrist and termination of stay in DS."
Not only this, "repeated intimidation" but also to "false and flawed investigation" workers PCH, I complained to, among other MPSV, the Public Ombudsman of the Czech Republic, the Government Commissioner for Human Rights, the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate.
The answer I got "only" from the former "Chairman of the Senate Committee on Education, Culture, Human Rights and Petitions" p. Jaromíra Jermář.
In his letter, Mr. Jaromír Jermář states that "under my notice, asked to comment on the individual items of my complaint, Director of Home for Seniors Mary Málková". Director DS its "expression" Chairman of the Senate Committee p. Jermář said that "the individual points of my complaints are not based on truth." She also stated that "the investigation of my complaint in the DS, I personally attended, along with her ​​staff and PCH were also present clients, which I complained." At that moment I could think of nothing else but that "Psychiatric examination should be ordered Director of DS, because it's not the first time I was on her side to unreasonably falsely accused and preposterous lies, were those to whom it is sent, regarded as Truth without its submissions to verify. "
In his "false and defamatory observations," which sent the authorities and institutions where I sent my complaint, wrote, among other things, that "all my complaints about her and the situation in the DS are unjustified", although "at that time were the results of my investigation complaints that were then made ​​by Mgr. Hall and to confirm the legitimacy of a substantial part of my complaint. "   "She, too," that "so far I've come to terms with his mentally handicapped and have no idea about their future life" while already at that time had a "professional opinion about my psychologist overall psychological state in which they wrote about my good mental state, on my quest to integrate into normal life balance with my disability, and preparedness to handle other potential problems. " This "psychological examination, it was a mandatory part of the stay of each patient at the rehabilitation clinic" in Hradec Králové, where I learned to walk with a prosthesis.
"Similar false and defamatory letters," wrote of me and sent inter alia to the Government Office, too, then, "Director of Social Care Health" PCH, ing. Matulová. The extra "claimed" that "payments related to the provision of rehabilitation (medical) aids and repairs, paid for me PCH" while perhaps "even small children know that these costs are covered by health insurance." Ing. Matulová "in their false and defamatory letters to the" claimed "that" as a result of drunkenness I frostbitten and so I have been amputated lower limb. " Not only that, I was at that time already "several years voluntarily complete teetotaler," but "this for their blatantly false statement has ing. Matulová no written document and can not have." "At the time I was taken to a hospital in Prague-Krči, I was rather dehydrated".
I'll get back to "investigate my complaint to aggressive behavior" DS clients, in 2010.
"Aggressive behavior", especially one of the "clients" in the room next to my person persisted, but rather "after a favorable expression" Director DS and "control" of the CCP, the "crescendo". Therefore, I handed him the DS 'complaint again. " This time, join me as "two other clients DS, which this obviously mentally disturbed and eternally drunken client,

long vulgarly cursed and threatened to kill "and their" written statement in which he described the aggressive and vulgar behavior of the client, was joined by "volunteers" DS. Only then, keeping DS "reluctantly admitted the legitimacy of my complaint to this client." The fact that the leadership of DS "had no joy 'proves even" distorted and incomplete record of this investigation. " "If before Mgr. Hall and her staff really wanted something to investigate, so I would have to give the truth now 15. 9. 2010 ". One of the "reasons" why "control" led by Mgr. Halový "turned my legitimate complaint against me," was definitely "trying to intimidate me, so I have the DS complained about anything." Other "reasons" why leadership and DS Mgr. Hale "kept a protective arm" of these "aggressive clients", was apparently the "fact" that the other "client-alcoholics," at that time "unexpectedly became the owner of real estate in and around Prague." After this the "reality" apparently "drunk driving" mentioned before personnel DS, this client became "the first of the elect" in this DS and certainly "because" it was him and his roommate, whom he considered his best friend "tolerated their drunken rampage in the room where they lived." Almost every day she went to this "profiteer" worker "social sector" DS and as he said, "still pushing him to sign some papers, saying that it was for his own good, and promised him for apparently even moving to Prague", where he wanted to because there's a lot of friends, and there's also more pubs than in Heřmanova Městci ". This "social worker" named him director (that I've heard with my own ears) promised that he "Get a good buyer that land in and around Prague restituoval". This client, but in the meantime "contacted any buyer" from Prague, who offered him for his "reality" 100 000 "on hand, immediately after signing the sales contract." After it learned DS director, was on her side 'interest in events around the client even more, "even though he was not very pleasant," as himself in front of some clients on several occasions. The director of a social worker DS, persuaded him to candidates from Prague did not sell anything, that if wait a minute, so he gathered together a buyer who will pay even 10 times more. " "Become rich client", which at that time was about 73 years old, but "was already determined that the land is sold for 100 000, candidates from Prague, because he calculated that this money is enough for him alcohol and cigarettes for life" . As he said, "better sparrow in the hand than a pigeon on the roof." When he arrived "buyer" to the client to his room, signed a "sales (purchase) contract" under conditions that already had pre-arranged "invaded" his room director DS with the social worker. Then, there 'quarrel broke out, which is sometimes heard in Italian films. " "Merchant" and director of DS, among other things, began "loudly arguing over who the two of them bigger pickle and one of them thinks the client really well." Then what a "contract concluded" and "happy buyer" left, client-vendor "had to sign a paper director", which "supposedly" should be "Declaration that was director, warned that selling their land below cost ". Merchant Moreover vowed to "client gives extra mobile phone and the older electric scooter." Both of these "gifts more" client anyway "never used" finished "God knows where." With a mobile phone "could not handle" and because he was "always drunk, had a problem to keep the chair, let alone to ride on an electric scooter."
And as "DS leadership dealt with my" complaint against these eternally drunken, aggressive clients "after" having to recognize the legitimacy of my complaint? " The two "friends" moved to another room, on the same corridor. Their "friendship did not last long," because "become rich client discovered that his" roommate best friend in the world ", which not only" borrowed "money, but" solved and all the alcohol you drank together, and smoked a cigarette together "from him "borrows more money without his knowledge!" Only after about it among themselves, "brawl", the management of "split", every other department.


In this article I want to focus mainly on the "response" of some "responsible" office "in all that time, indicating that the" bullying and stealing clients ", including other" serious deficiencies "in the DS Meřmanově Městci. To any at all "answer" from "responsible authorities" got at the same time send their "electronic complaints and findings" of the so-called. "Senior Home" (DS) in Meřmanově Městci and complaints about the "lack of interest or biased approach to addressing these complaints, by the founder-PCH "to other addresses, including the media. Some "responsible" such as Office of the Government with its "Human Rights Commissioner, does not correspond at all" V "case" as it mainly since what is "Agent" p. Dienstbier not blame them. "Government Commissioner for Human Rights," p. Dienstbier, who "came from asocial and mafia-like environment" of the City Council is "one of the Prague authorities of his time at City Hall who my electronically filed complaints of human rights violations and other wrongdoing in a home for the elderly will never read. " "Every time me his e-mail address, came the reply, unread."
The "Office of the Ombudsman," I "several years ago" got "three answers" in which one "referring to the lack of competence 'second turn on the" lack of capacity "without me" also referred "at City Hall. In the third "answers" from my "Office of the Ombudsman CR" responded that "my complaints are not addressed at all!" Since then me from this "Office" comes right "automatic electronic acknowledgment of receipt of the complaint."
Z "of the Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs' answer, of course," referring again to City Hall. " MPSV in the past, among other things, "alluding" to the so-called. "Practice Inspection MPSV that any flaws in the DS not found". How does "Practice Inspection" MPSV, the DS took place in 2008?
She came to me in the room, one member of the "Inspection" that "I was randomly selected among other clients DS". She asked me "how I like the DS, if I am not satisfied with something," etc. "I informed her," among other things "about the problems I had with rehabilitation and orthopedic surgeon, about the situation in Vile, where I lived at the time, the illegal collection of fees from clients for importing medical devices and also the lack of interest and harassment from management DS ". At the same time, I 'member of Inspection "asked me to provide' a copy of the minutes of conversation with me." This "Inspector agreed with this" with the "Write gets another day." Additionally me, "she promised to inform about my case, seniors, and I will try to help me to get away with DS because she knew did not belong to this device". The next day I made this "inspector" in the DS 'sought in vain. " I was told that "Practice Inspection ended yesterday." "Never again I made this inspector, DS seen and heard from me."
On my "complaints" to "benefits" in the DS "responded" in the past, too, "Czech Helsinki Committee" (CHV), specifically one of its member, pi. Baslová. I visited her in Prague, at the headquarters of "the Committee". I brought along some "documents that confirmed my allegations of bullying and psychological intimidation by management DS and illegal charging for the importation of medical aids." Pi. Baslová these "documents copied and acknowledged that if only on the basis of these documents, it is clear that the psychological intimidation and illegal collection of fees actually occurred." They were "defamatory and threatening letters from City Hall and director of the DS, as well as the" certificate of return allegedly illegally collected fees on the importation of medical devices ". Another "intimidating letters" I then sent pi. Baslové with CHC, electronically. Pi. Baslová me "promised that he would soon about these intimidating and slanderous letters to inform the clerk at the Social Department of the City Hall, Dr.. Mrnková, which was featured in these letters, such as a contact person whom he knows well the extra power. " "Never again, however, I have since then Mrs. Baslové, or CHC, no reply to e-mails received."
KDU-CSL p. Bělobrádek, which I also sent some of their complaints, which describe "robbing, bullying and intimidation" by the leadership of DS and PCH, responded by saying that "for any human rights violations is not, but it's a violation of the Treaty provision of social services. " I was present at several "protest actions" organized "National Disability Council," which is the "Christian philanthropist" participated, allegedly because "that he revealed how he cares not having violated human and civil rights of the disabled." In fact, however, Mr. Bělobrádek "need every voice to be ever got into Parliament."
Another "known human rights defenders", which I wrote and asked in vain for help was "Amnesty International" and "People in Need". These "human rights defenders, generously subsidized by the Czech government, just to keep contented, though once in a while, a statement of human rights abuses in China or Korea." On the "whistle" on human rights violations in the Czech Republic, rather "do not respond because they could lose their subsidies."
"Criminal complaint" I "in connection with rumors robbing and bullying" filed with the Prosecutor's Office in Chrudim "came to investigate," City Police Department in Heřmanova Městci and it apparently "due to good contacts with the Director of DS, no attempt verify the evidence I put the notification, or to get some more. "
On the Internet it is "crawling" other "self-appointed defender of human rights" but rather "wait until somebody sends money to the account, so it is actually" hangers-human hyenas "who" abuse of lawlessness that prevails in the Czech Republic since 1993, and inspires a false impression that will help them to enforce their rights. " Are often hidden under the umbrella of a civic association and offer "legal advice". Their "advice" ends when it finds that the "problem" is not as easy as they thought, and could "bump", then they have "more than once heard from again." Legal advice that these "self-appointed protectors" provide are widely available on the Internet. I have had had "unfortunately" experience.
 "The greatest merit" to what happens in "Home for seniors" in Meřmanově Městci, has its "founder", the Prague City Hall, whose officers and councilors, among other things, "directly involved in human rights violations in the DS, support robbing the elderly and disabled in the DS. "
A "do not care who the mayor, or what is the composition of the Council PCH". It is obvious that "PCH dominate the agenda of the old structure, which mutated to those who came after 1989 and are much more durable." Just among themselves "swapped at the trough."
PCH has apparently "came arguments that even somehow explain their conduct" in connection with the DS in Meřmanově Městci. My e-mail letters, responds through pi. Lenka Jílkové, assistant Doc. Ing. Mgr. Martin Dlouhy, Dr., MSc, City Hall Councillor for Health, Social Policy and Housing, which to me, "announces" that "unless my electronically filed complaints with an advanced electronic signature, it will not deal with them at all PCH" as if they ever really dealt with. "It's the part of the City Hall for the first time", what he wants from me, "electronic signature". It is obvious that "when one has several titles before and after its name, does not mean that it is a decent man, or an expert in its place". I wonder what it says "Public Ombudsman", which the letter-complaint also send, as well as previous "letters-complaint". If I get from him "finally answer any at all and will not ask me too advanced electronic signature". It is "interesting" that "The prosecution accepted my criminal complaint, without an electronic signature."


It is obvious that "the fate of the people who end up in similar" device "as is" Home for the Elderly "in Heřmanova Městci sponsored by the City of Prague, is no longer one cares if you do not have any relatives." These "people are often leaving the predatory behavior of employees of these devices, without any possibility to call somewhere some justice." At a minimum, "secondary education", in addition to the "relevant training" should be "a fundamental condition for the exercise of direct care services." On the internet I once read an ad offering work, published "Organizations providing social and health services are old, ill and disabled" clients. It was a "job-offer caregiver / ka direct care" for their clients. Required education: "It may be practical (special) schools, training provided." Two rows away, the advertisement, which sought "workers into service in the bar (behind the counter)." Required Education: "Secondary with GCE". Secondary education or higher education, however, the same "does not guarantee that the person is able to work in the social field." This proves "arrogant and antisocial behavior" leadership "Home for seniors" in Meřmanově Městci and all those "Magistrů and engineers" who are on the job, "Department of Social Welfare and Health" PCH. It is "a big mistake" that all employees who work in social and health policy, does not "regular psychological tests" to see if these people can ever like, very "responsible profession" to perform.
On the internet, I accidentally found on the page "parliamentary sheets", dated 12 9. 2010 article describing the "inappropriate conduct" so-called. "Social ombudsman" PCH Mgr. Hall, towards the "pregnant woman" who "came the ombudsman, ask for help in solving the difficult social and housing situation." In this case it was a "test" by MF editor, who wanted to know "if the Social Ombudsman fulfills its function responsibly." Apparently it did so on the basis of "adverse comments" on "activity" of the "ombudsman". Mgr. Hal, this "negotiation" MF editor describes as "trying to produce a tabloid scandal against her person and dehonestaci labor officials and representatives of PCH "and" relied on the testimony of "his assistant Mgr. Štědron. I was personally in the described "case", but I believe that, as editor of MF describes. On the basis of their "personal experience" I can say that "Mgr. Halová as Social Ombudsman and Mgr. Štědroň, her assistant at the time they worked at City Hall, lied, and their expressions were directly involved in my harassment and intimidation, will my criticism of conditions in the DS and access to officials and councilors PCH to my legitimate complaints. " Their "asocial behavior, not only violated the Code of Conduct, but also all the rules and regulations laid down for checks in the facility, providing social care." And as for PCH, he himself "dehonestuje" in the public eye, has at least ten years.
As another example, confirming an "arrogant and antisocial behavior," officials of the Social Department of the City Hall, describe the situation that I experienced when called. "Baptism of books published by the initiative of the DS leadership, on the occasion of 60 anniversary of this home," which is actually "fawning a hymn to address the Director DS ".
Money for the release of this "book", levying DS leadership from clients, mainly from those which do not go beyond their relatives. Probably because the absence of 'inconvenience', if 'complaints relatives to this sponsorship. " These "clients-sponsors", but he apparently "did not lead for the DS that is invited to refreshments, followed by a carriage ride in the park." This "glee" attended "only invited guests" from the City Heřmanův Městec, the social welfare department in Chrudim, representatives of the City Hall and besides them, many other "unknown yet".
Looking at these "merry guests", I was reminded of "scenes from movies to witnesses, when the nobility enjoyed a Chudina is a respectful distance, watching hungrily."
That day, I is "transparent", to which I drew attention to the "Prague City Hall in support of bullying and stealing from clients in this DS", rode in a wheelchair to a park where there was a "rides". Present "invited guests looked as if they could not see anything." I spoke to one of the "invited guests", whom I knew as "one of Magistrates, representatives of City Hall," which was "frequent guest" in the DS.
I asked him "why me PCH help find other suitable housing when they know they do not belong to this home, plus I'm PCH staff several times promised"?
This "representative PCH", he replied: "Why should you have to help PCH, when it publicly constantly complaining and protesting?"
On my objection "complains because PCH my legitimate complaints usually does not deal with, or is objectively not solve" this "representative PCH" he "did not respond at all." Apparently "found a reasonable answer."
Some "representatives" of the CCP and director DS, in his "false pleadings" to my complaints, I am writing among other "lies" too that PCH offered me a "special care and accommodation with employment in Prague." It is "another dirty lie on their sides, worthy to address them Psychiatrist".
When the "problems" with prosthetics, I had to "help themselves". The so-called. "Special Care" probably thinks PCH "threats Psychiatrist" by director DS. This "care" I really declined.
Regarding "accommodation offer a job in Prague," it is a "very distorted information".
In April 2009, I received from the director of the Department of Social and Health Care PCH, ing. Matulová letter in which, among other things wrote "my strong and unequivocal will to self-fulfillment and motivation for self-sufficiency and self-fulfillment." Ing. Matulová hereinafter "wrote about the new Act no. 108/2006 Coll., In which the emphasis is on the provision of social services that are geared towards social inclusion of clients, ie. Allow you to lead a full and quality life in their natural environment." It also states that "the provisions of § 2 para. 2 of Act no. 108/2006 Coll., On social services, as amended, directly states that assistance must act on people actively support the development of their independence, to motivate them to engage in activities that do not lead to long-term persistence or worsening of adverse social situation.
Ing. Matulová me in his letter, "offered admission to the so-called. House of Training Living in Prague 14 - Černý Most, where I will have the opportunity to acquire skills for self-management of the household." It further states that "in response to this temporary residence (approximately 6 months) you can get an apartment rental special purpose in Prague, with the possibility of buying the necessary social services and support possible in the labor market and the financial resources to cover the costs of maintaining a separate household contact system of assistance in material need, the payment of social welfare benefits and possibly their own gainful activity ".
Director of the Department of Social Welfare and Health PCH ing. Matulová, asked me to tell her my opinion no later than 30. 4. 2009. Since this time I "letter" I got my hands on, I'm "too much time to think not" . It reminded me of "conduct social worker" DS, which gave me for me "onerous contracts" and wanted me to "just signed, but I read this Agreement."
I do not know on what basis ing. Matulová "she said," that "I need to acquire skills for self-management of the household." At a time when I had my own family, I have most of the work related to the operation performed household alone, due to disability my former wife. Such things do not forget, if a person is "mentally and physically healthy."
   As for getting "special-purpose flats," I did not meet, among others, too "basic condition for the application" on the assignment of any apartment in Prague, which is "permanent residence" in Prague. In the case of "flat special purpose", it sometimes must be "at least 2-3 years of permanent residence." In 2009, I had "three years of permanent residence" in Heřmanova Městci and this "fact" ing. Matulová "knew".
In this "letter" ing. Matulová, the "ever written about any particular job." A "never before and even then, with me, none of PCH or the DS leadership, talked about, that I can get a job in Prague, even with accommodation." If this were true, it would have a "tender" left "sign" as they do "with his every expression, even if it's nonsense many times, or falsehood."
"The offer, staying at the House of Training Housing" (DTB) in Prague, I refused, saying that "in Prague, there are enough people who do not have anywhere to live, and they would be happy for any similar offer." In my "case", they were "trying PCH, get me away" from the DS in Meřmanově Městci. The longest half a year stay in the "DTB" would told me that "the allocation of special-purpose flats do not qualify under applicable laws and could put me into some other device, similar to what I am now, or I'd end up on the street if I disagreed ". If I had a PCH, wanted "to really help, so I would have a special purpose apartment offered directly by me and did not make an offer, which knew in advance that he does not have a chance to succeed."
"PCH, through his actions with impunity violates all laws and clauses on social services, on which it relies." "Lawless jungle and absolute absence of human rights protection in the Czech Republic, it allows PCH".

I also happened that I got from the leadership of DS 'offer to move to a nursing home intended for the mentally handicapped ", in the Central Region and" social worker "DS to me this" offer "handed out at the" uttered stupid to offensive remarks "that" there'll finally have peace and maybe they even get married. "
Lately I get from management DS "offers accommodation in private hostels" or "offer lodgings in private homes" that download from the Internet, probably "make it appear that the DS is interested to solve my poor social situation", even if it must know that "the private rented can be dismissed at any time, without giving any reason and may find ourselves on the street." A "barrier private 'hostels, multi-bed rooms, definitely" not suitable for a disabled person, "which is in addition to the prosthesis, would sometimes even a wheelchair. "The rejection of these offers" a leadership DS too "lets sign".
"Home for the Elderly" hl. City Hall is actually already too "private company". Director of the "home" here "hired without tender, his own daughter, as his representative, responsible for the economic segment DS". That would be the "contributory organization" could not stand. It would be "interesting" to know "who from City Hall, has made a private company, the largest proportion"?
Another "integral part" of stay in DS is called. "Individual users plan" (IPU). It is a "multi-page dossier that describes the overall health of the user and client-mentioned therein" goals, aspirations and "client, which should be decisive for the staff to the client in the DS, it felt like home." The so-called. "Key workers" among caregivers DS, "IPU filled with disgust." I consider it to be "unnecessary paperwork". I think the same thing, but because what is in the "Individual Plan" writes equally ignored. In my "goals and wishes, as soon as possible to learn to walk, have a job and as soon as possible to get away from the DS," which I stated from the beginning of his stay in the DS, me here or at City Hall, just "never helped." For some time I have "refused to cooperate in this paper reporting activities". Keeping DS, however, "is not able to provide the client nor that got washed clothes back on time and in order, although it has, moreover, in IPU, although it is one of the fundamental obligations of service providers, stated in the Contract for the provision of social services." Some clients, as they put their "target" in the IPU 'desire to be with them well treated until they are permanently confined to bed. " They make it seem "under the impression that what ever they see around them."
In this context, remember the "case of excessive health care" from the staff, which I witnessed one called. "Hospice".
LDN in the room with me, among others, lived an elderly patient, who was in his eighties. Still, he had "Alzheimer's disease", was "very active", mainly in the night "for some unknown reasons", was popular with some members of staff. One of them was this "cute grandfather used to take him" to the room to the other patients, even though it was "against the rules, and patients did not want it." The "grandfather behaved aggressively towards patients," the evening in addition, these rooms through "the patient climbed into bed, they stole something, or at least they peed slippers". Primark department or personnel with the "do nothing, even though patients have complained." Staff "changed his mind" after them this "cute grandfather" in the office, where it paraded "for fun" someday "pooped and pee into the trash, refused to leave office and defended himself physically." Then this "grandfather-patient" got "sedative injection, after which he fell asleep and did not wake up until his death." Before he died, so it more than a week "feeding tubes help."
In this DS, there's something "similar". If the client "harasses and attacks, some other clients, nothing happens." "Poorly but goes one who dares to criticize the staff or management DS".
    "Home for the Elderly" hl. City Hall in Meřmanově Městci, on their "web-site" states among other things also information that provides "social counseling" for its clients. A client who "trust" turns for advice on this "social division" must reckon with the fact that his "personal problems", will after some time i talk to the "last cleaning lady" because "there is nothing to keep a secret ".
Clients, however, "no one" tells, for example, that "if they wear glasses, have from three diopters, entitled to the frames and glasses with a fully covered by insurance." Then it would not happen, that "will collect a fee" on new glasses CZK 2,000, from ninety clients, which had about "14 diopters." Me personally it took a long time before I get this "fact discovered by accident, and rather pushed" by an ophthalmologist.
In July 2006, my DS brought ordered "wheelchair", from Meyra. The truck was transmitted in the DS, the courtyard. She was present at the former "rehabilitation nurse" DS and "importer", which I inv. Trolley brought, rehabilitation nurse who introduced herself as "company owner VLK-Slatiňany that for DS importing medical and rehabilitation aids". Rehabilitation nurse, after me, "demanded CZK 250 for importing wheelchair payable to the importer." I said that "fee for import of medical equipment covered by the insurer." Rehabilitation me replied that it was not true, that's how it here (in DS) pays each, there's no scam and management DS knows about it. " I was glad that I finally "his wheelchair," so I paid CZK 250, it was my last money I had and rehabilitation gave me a "confirmation of payment, signed by the owner of the company VLK-Slatiňany". Then they brought inv. Trolley, even for one client DS that "import fee, also did not like." The client then u NGA "written asking discovered" the NGA "duties on imports of medical aids actually paid" so turned on DS management that it was this "unlawfully collected fee refunded." Because the DS this "scam neutajil", these "fees were refunded to other clients who were still alive." Who knows how much money, this was "fraudulently" selected before. Money for "fees", went "home" clients "rehabilitation nurse", along with other workers DS. "Exchange" for money "demanded proof of payment" and instead they gave them to clients' letterhead of the company VLK-Slatiňany, with the signature of the owner of the company, which stated that "the client confirms his signature, acceptance amount CZK 250, for allegedly illegally charged for import of medical devices ".
The DS is also picking "unlawful, regulatory fees in health care," from people who had "an income of less than CZK 800", a long time after they were people with such "low-income" from these charges "liberation."
Then I "social worker" DS, brought to the Internet, where I had this "government regulation" shown on the website of the Ministry of Health, because when I said it before, and said that "she does not know about it," and apparently "it did not even try to find out. "
At that time, "Minister of Health" CR, pi. Filipiová, which was also disabled, in a wheelchair. In "television talk show" then "invited" the viewer to "announce something to the unauthorized collection of regulatory fees in health care, she had to take care of this and draw the consequences." So I'm Mrs. "Minister" wrote about "the illegal regulatory charges" in the DS and "to this day I have no answer from her did not."
In Meřmanově Městci are two pharmacies, and each of them have "a rich selection of" medicines and other goods, which is usually available at any pharmacy. What they do not, they are willing to "bring order and, perhaps the next day. However, the staff goes DS, buy some clients medication to "township" Choltice, distant about 10 km from Heřmanova Městce. As I once had the opportunity to compare the prices of drugs purchased in Choltice prices of medicines in Heřmanova Městci, so in Choltice, these same drugs were generally about "one-quarter more expensive." Then no wonder, when some clients-smokers' cigarette butts collected from the ashtray in the castle courtyard, or go to collect cigarette butts around town that had nothing to smoke because they are paying unnecessarily big money for drugs. They were here i "cases" where clients DS, "went to a nearby supermarket to beg or the square." Too "nice advertising" for the DS.
"Nice ad" DS, made its leadership even in 2013 also by the fact that "at least once a month", was leaving "on an open fire in the park, burn paper waste, including boxes and remnants of plastic, which is found in it" . However it be "someone else", he would have got from the police "at least a fine".
From the "founder", PCH, I've got several "warning" that "of all that is happening in the DS, and they know that an overview". So are "accomplices".
Alojz Janiga.